Home / Resources / After a failed embryo transfer

After a failed embryo transfer:
what to do next

A failed transfer is hard. The instinct is to book the next cycle immediately. Before you do, here are the questions worth asking, and what a useful second opinion actually involves.

By Dr Vasileios Sarafis MD. UK-trained fertility specialist, Thessaloniki and Athens. Last reviewed 12 June 2026.

A negative result after an embryo transfer is one of the lowest points in fertility treatment. The natural response is to want to start again as quickly as possible. Sometimes that is the right call. But a pause to ask the right questions can change what the next cycle looks like. It is also important to understand when failed transfers may be considered recurrent implantation failure, because one unsuccessful transfer alone does not establish that diagnosis.

First, give yourself a moment

There is no medical urgency to transfer again within days. Taking a few weeks to gather information, request your records, and think clearly does not reduce your chances. It often improves them, because the next decision is made with more information.

The questions worth asking

Whether you stay with your current clinic or seek a second opinion, these are the questions that move a conversation from “try again” towards “try again with a plan”:

  • Were the embryos genetically tested? If not, the embryo itself remains the most likely unexamined variable.
  • What did the lining look like at transfer? Thickness, pattern, and blood flow all matter.
  • Has the uterine cavity been properly assessed? A standard scan is not the same as advanced ultrasound or hysteroscopy.
  • Has chronic endometritis been excluded? It is common, often silent, and treatable.
  • Is there a reason to suspect adenomyosis? It is frequently missed on routine scanning.
  • What exactly would change in the next protocol, and why? “A different protocol” is not an answer unless the reasoning is clear.

When the history supports it, uterine assessment may include testing for chronic endometritis.

A good second opinion is not about repeating everything.

If you have already had investigations done elsewhere, the most valuable thing is often interpretation, stitching existing results into a coherent plan, rather than ordering the same tests again.

What to bring to a second opinion

The more complete your records, the more useful the consultation. Try to gather:

  • Embryology reports, including grading and any genetic (PGT-A) results.
  • Details of the protocols used in each cycle, including medications and doses.
  • Endometrial thickness and any scan images from around the time of transfer.
  • Results of any prior investigations: ERA, EMMA, ALICE, immune panels, hysteroscopy reports.
  • Relevant medical history, including thyroid, autoimmune, and clotting conditions.

Key takeaways

When a second opinion is the right starting point

If you arrive with prior investigation results already in hand, a structured second opinion is usually the appropriate place to begin. The goal is to understand what has already been ruled in or out, identify the genuine gaps, and recommend only the tests whose results would change the plan.

Turn a failed cycle into a plan

Two routes, depending on where you are. If you want a structured review of work already done, start with a second opinion. If you want the full framework for investigating repeated failure, start there.

How long should I wait before another embryo transfer?

There is no fixed medical rule, and a short pause to gather information and request records does not reduce your chances. Many patients use the gap to arrange a second opinion or targeted investigation so the next transfer is made with more information.

Embryology reports with grading and any genetic testing results, details of the protocols and medications used, endometrial thickness and scan images from around transfer, results of any prior investigations such as ERA, EMMA, ALICE or immune panels, and your relevant medical history.

It should not. A useful second opinion starts by interpreting the investigations you have already had and identifying genuine gaps. Tests are only repeated where there is a clinical reason, and only ordered where the result would change the plan.

Common questions.

Let us look at what happened, properly.

If you arrive with prior investigation results, the second opinion is the appropriate starting point. We review your history and prior cycles, then I provide a written recommendation on what, if anything, is worth investigating next. You can book an online consultation for a cycle review.

Sarafis Fertility Clinic · Thessaloniki & Athens · info@sarafisfertility.com · +30 210 444 9027

This page is for educational purposes and does not constitute medical advice. Indications for recurrent implantation failure investigation depend on individual clinical history and prior treatment. For guidance specific to your situation, book a consultation.